Stats
Remember when we wrote back in March about the work being done to promote contracting opportunities for women and minorities in small business? While those initiatives were focused here in New York State, they coincided with SBA’s initial proposal in February to account for the under-representation of women business owners in federal contracting.
Well this month, the SBA has made its rule official: to implement a women-owned small business (WOSB) contracting program. Because the federally-set minimum of 5% contract allocation to WOSBs has not yet been met, the program will offer the tools and support needed to make up for this deficiency. Astoundingly, 83 different industries have been identified (by this RAND study) in which WOSBs are under-represented or substantially under-represented.
There are some noteworthy provisions of the new rule:
- “Women-owned” is defined as 51% ownership and control of the business by a female US citizen. The firm must be “small” in its primary industry in accordance with SBA’s size standards for that industry.
- The final rule removes the requirement, set forth in a prior proposed version, that each federal agency certify that it had engaged in discrimination against women-owned small businesses in order for the program to apply to contracting by that agency.
- The proposed rule allows women-owned small businesses to self-certify as “WOSBs” or to be certified by third-party certifiers, including government entities and private certification groups. WOSBs that self-certify are required to submit a robust certification verification, to complete the certifications at the federal Online Representation and Certification Application (“ORCA”) Web site, and also to submit a core set of eligibility-related documents to an online “document repository” to be maintained by the SBA.
You can read the full run-down of the final rule components here: PDF
SBA will begin a 120-day implementation process for the program. Contracts should be available in early 2011.
You may know that the Canisius College Women’s Business Center has taken increased measures in the past year to help women in business become certified and obtain contracts, particularly with our certification and contracting webinar series. We look forward to continuing this necessary focus on contract procurement opportunities for women-owned business and working with the SBA as it implements this crucial program.
What do you think about the final rule? Have you experienced the certification and contracting process? Leave a comment.
Author: In the News, Policy, Resources, Stats, Women | 1 Comment »
This post is inspired by a December 2009 report on the unique management style of women proprietors and their growing contribution to the US economy. Issued by The Guardian Life Small Business Research Institute, the report states that women, as owners and managers are:
- more diligently engaged in strategic and tactical facets of their business
- more proactively customer-focused
- more likely to incorporate community and environment into their business plans
- more receptive to input and guidance from internal and external advisors
- more committed to creating opportunities for others.
The Institute cites these qualities among other reasons for a projected increase in jobs created by woman-owned small business. In fact, by 2018, they forecast that women small business owners will create 5 to 5.5 million new jobs in the US, thereby “transforming the workplace of tomorrow into a far more inclusive, horizontally managed environment.”
Aside from these fantastic economic projections, I think the most interesting point the report makes is that the woman business owner is a more engaged proprietor. Because women are more careful in cultivating their customer base and more invested in creating opportunities, positive working relationships and meaningful contributions to their business and community, the impact of women-owned business will not only be greater by 2018, but it will constructively benefit the environment in which we work and do business.
Click here to find the full report.
Author: Stats, Women | No Comments »
Did you know that, even in 2010, there is still a considerable pay gap for women in the United States? According to the Corporate Gender Gap 2010 Report, issued by the World Economic Forum in Geneva, Switzerland, women make, on average, only 77% of the average male income. This incredible margin exists despite the fact that women account for more than half of the workforce (52%) and over half of college graduates. With the majority of our “human talent” represented by women, how is it that we are still consistently underpaid and undervalued, compared to our male counterparts?
In an effort to acknowledge this continued disparity, next week, on April 20th, the Women’s Business Center will be observing Equal Pay Day. This day, which symbolizes how far into 2010 women must work to earn what men made in 2009, was established by the National Committee on Pay Equity (NCPE) in 1996 to spread public awareness of gender wage disparity. That day, we ask that you wear red to illustrate how women are still “in the red” when it comes to their pay.
We also invite you to an event hosted by the Canisius College Women’s Studies Department and the Women’s Business Center scheduled for that Tuesday: “Equal Pay Day: A Dicussion and Workshop on Closing the Gender Pay Gap.” A panel discussion will address the realities of the gender pay gap issue and the following workshop will present tatics for women and students to effectively negotiate their salary. This event is free and open to the public. Click here for more information.
*all statistics from The World Economic Forum. Click here to access the full reports.
What do you think about pay equity? Leave a comment.
Author: Events, In the News, Stats, Women | 5 Comments »
I write this as President Obama signs into law the long-disputed health care reform bill.
Whether or not you agree with the legislation, the benefits it brings to small business owners and employees is indisputable. Steve Strauss, small business expert and USA Today contributor writes (in this article) that, overall, the bill is good for small business. Just consider the status quo, he says.
• Only 49% of businesses with 3 to 9 employees (the vast majority of small businesses) offered any type of health insurance to their employees in 2008, down from 58% less than a decade ago.
• 29% of employees at businesses with 25 employees or less were uninsured in 2007, and the number is certainly higher today.
Strauss goes on to say that, “the main reason health insurance is so expensive for small business is that there is a narrow pool of people being insured. Bigger companies with more employees are better able to spread the risk, so premiums are lower, and they also have more buying power due to their size.”
What the bill does is allow small businesses and the self-employed to purchase insurance plans through cooperative pools, or exchanges. “By pooling small businesses together,” Strauss writes, “these purchasing cooperatives are expected to offer rates that should be lower because of 1) increased group purchasing power, and 2) bigger pools of insured customers.”
But mandates for small business employers to provide health care coverage is what seems to have most people upset. These mandates, he says, will have little effect on small businesses, and exempt businesses with less than 50 employees. But even those companies are expected to buy in because of incentives like low cost through exchanges and the various tax breaks and credits included in the legislation.
Additionally, these benefits are also expected to lead to a boost in employment at small firms now offering coverage, or where affordable coverage has become available through purchasing pools.
So even if you think health care reform is a pill you just can’t swallow, know that these changes do in fact benefit small business and hopefully you’ll be seeing these changes soon.
What do you think about the bill? Leave a comment.
Author: In the News, Policy, Stats | 4 Comments »
If you’ve been following the blog the last couple of weeks, you know that we’ve been investigating the concept of applying social media to your marketing efforts as a small business owner or entrepreneur. We’ve focused on the “what” and the “how” of social media, but what’s more interesting is the “why”: what are the effects of using social media that would lead you to create this kind of presence?
Well, we recently came across a study from Mashable that tracks the effects of companies and brands using Facebook and Twitter. They report that “consumers are 67% more likely to buy from the brands they follow on Twitter, and 51% more likely to buy from a brand they follow on Facebook. Moreover, they’re 79% more likely to recommend their Twitter follows to a friend, and 60% more likely to do the same on Facebook.”
The study also indicates thats consumers may have a “negative perception” of a brand that hasn’t tapped in to social media.
See the original post here.
What do you think about these statistics? Leave a comment.
Author: Marketing, Media, Stats | No Comments »